Journal of Data Science

Peer Review

Peer review is an important process to ensure the quality of the papers accepted and published. All papers submitted are subjected to inspection of the experts from the same or related fields, to ensure the relevance of the content to the scope of publication. In this process, comments from experts, including the suitability of the content, originality, novelty, and presentation are given to the authors to improve their papers before the publication.

The Journal exercises the double-blind peer review process to our best to ensure fair editorial decision in the publication process. All the experts who serve as reviewers have the right to accept or reject a submission based on their own decision. The Editorial Team of the Journal, by the recommendation from the reviewers, will either publish a paper without revision, publish the paper after the revision by authors, or reject it from the publication.


Peer Review of Content

JOIT exercise the double-blind peer review process to our best to ensure fair editorial decision in the publication process. All the experts who serve as reviewers have the right to accept or reject a submission based on their own decision. JOIT, by the recommendation from the reviewers, will either publish a paper without revision, publish the paper after the revision by authors, or reject it from the publication in JOIT.


Peer Review of Guideline

Peer review is a fundamental process at JOIT, ensuring the high quality and scholarly rigor of published articles. Every manuscript submitted to JOIT undergoes thorough evaluation by experts in the same or related fields to confirm its relevance to the journal's scope.


The Peer Review Process:

During the peer review process, expert reviewers provide critical feedback to authors aimed at enhancing the quality of their work prior to publication. This feedback encompasses several key aspects, such as:


Double-Blind Peer Review:

JOIT employs a double-blind peer review process to promote impartial and objective editorial decisions. In this system:

This anonymity aims to minimize bias and ensure that evaluations are based solely on the scholarly merit of the manuscript.

Reviewer Authority and Editorial Decision:

Experts serving as reviewers for JOIT have the authority to make independent recommendations regarding the suitability of a manuscript for publication. Based on their expert assessment, reviewers may recommend:


Editorial Outcome:

The final editorial decision on a manuscript is made by the JOIT editors, taking into careful consideration the recommendations provided by the peer reviewers. The possible outcomes are:

This rigorous peer review process underscores JOIT's commitment to publishing high-quality, impactful research.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES


JOIT editors guide the journal’s vision, oversee rigorous reviews, make informed decisions, and uphold ethical standards. Reviewers provide expert, unbiased evaluations, ensuring alignment with journal standards and maintaining confidentiality. Authors submit original, accurate work following guidelines and engaging with the review process. The publisher provides infrastructure, manages copyright, supports ethics, and ensures preservation. Please CLICK HERE for more information.